|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Origins of Social Capital: Evidence From a Survey of Post-Soviet Central Asia
Scott Radnitz1*,
Jonathan Wheatley2,
and
Christoph Zürcher3
1 University of Washington
2 Aarau Center for Democracy, University of Zurich, Switzerland
3 University of Ottawa
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sradnitz{at}gmail.com.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
This article investigates the determinants of social capital by analyzing an original survey of post-Soviet Central Asia. It tests hypotheses derived from two related questions: whether networks, norms, and trust are empirically related and the extent to which four factors—culture, regime type, perceptions of government responsiveness, and development interventions—predict levels of social capital. The results show that trust and norms diverge from networking. Interaction is higher under less repressive regimes and is further increased by development interventions; trust and norms are higher under conditions of greater repression. Culture does not affect any indicators of social capital, but perceptions of responsiveness correlate with higher levels of trust. As such, disaggregating social capital is a promising new direction for research. Scholars should investigate why the components of social capital sometimes correlate but at other times diverge, and they should consider the possibility of distinct causal mechanisms in their development.
First published on January 26, 2009, doi:10.1177/0010414008329893
Comparative Political Studies 2009;42:707.
A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2009

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|