This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0010414008315860v1 41/7/899    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Dalton, R. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems: Party System Polarization, Its Measurement, and Its Consequences

University of California, Irvine

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rdalton{at}uci.edu.

	Abstract

Previous research claims that the number of parties affects the representation of social cleavages in voting behavior, election turnout, patterns of political conflict, and other party system effects. This article argues that research typically counts the quantity of parties and that often the more important property is the quality of party competition—the polarization of political parties within a party system. The author first discusses why polarization is important to study. Second, the author provides a new measurement of party system polarization based on voter perceptions of party positions in the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, which includes more than 50 separate elections from established and developing democracies. Third, the author compares party polarization and party fractionalization as influences on cleavage-based and ideological voting and as predictors of turnout levels. The finding is that party polarization is empirically more important in explaining these outcomes.

First published on March 24, 2008, doi:10.1177/0010414008315860

Comparative Political Studies 2008;41:899.

A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Finseraas What if Robin Hood is a social conservative? How the political response to increasing inequality depends on party polarization Socioecon. Rev., June 13, 2009; (2009) mwp012v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]