This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0010414007313124v1 41/4-5/715    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Magaloni, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule

Stanford University

To survive in office, dictators need to establish power-sharing arrangements with their ruling coalitions, which are often not credible. If dictators cannot commit to not abusing their "loyal friends"—those who choose to invest in the existing autocratic institutions rather than in forming subversive coalitions— they will be in permanent danger of being overthrown, both by members of the ruling elite and by outside rivals. This article explores the role of autocratic political parties and elections (both one-party and multiparty) in mitigating the commitment problem, making power-sharing between the dictator and his ruling coalition possible.

Key Words: autocracy • political parties • autocratic elections • power-sharing • commitment problems • authoritarian longevity

This version was published on April 1, 2008

Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 41, No. 4-5, 715-741 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0010414007313124


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?