This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0010414006297169v1 41/3/309    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Binzer Hobolt, S. Articles by Klemmensen, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Government Responsiveness and Political Competition in Comparative Perspective

University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Robert Klemmensen

University of Southern Denmark

Governments in democratic systems are expected to respond to the issue preferences of citizens. Yet we have a limited understanding of the factors that cause levels of responsiveness to vary across time and between countries. In this article, the authors suggest that political contestation is the primary mechanism driving policy responsiveness and that this, in turn, is mediated by political institutions and government popularity. To test this proposition, the authors analyze the responsiveness of executive policy promises (speeches) and policy actions (public expenditure) in Britain, Denmark, and the United States in the period from 1970 to 2005. These time-series analyses show that higher levels of political contestation are associated with more responsive executives.

Key Words: responsiveness • speeches • budget • representation • competition

This version was published on March 1, 2008

Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 41, No. 3, 309-337 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0010414006297169


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?