Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Comparative Political Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0010414006295234v1
41/2/145    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larsen, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes

How Welfare Regimes Influence Public Support

Christian Albrekt Larsen

Aalborg University, Denmark

Why are people who live in liberal welfare regimes so reluctant to support welfare policy? And why are people who live in social democratic welfare regimes so keen to support welfare policy? This article seeks to give an institutional account of these cross-national differences. Previous attempts to link institutions and welfare attitudes have not been convincing. The empirical studies have had large difficulties in finding the expected effects from regime-dependent differences in self-interest, class interest, and egalitarian values. This article develops a new theoretical macro—micro link by combining the literature on deservingness criteria and the welfare regime theory. The basic ideas are that three regime characteristics, (a) the degree of universalism in welfare policy, (b) the differences in economic resources between "the bottom" and "the majority," and (c) the degree of job opportunities, have a profound impact on the public deservingness discussion and thereby on public support for welfare policy.

Key Words: welfare regime • deservingness • public support • micro foundation • welfare policy

This version was published on February 1, 2008

Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 41, No. 2, 145-168 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0010414006295234


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of European Social PolicyHome page
B. Vis
The importance of socio-economic and political losses and gains in welfare state reform
Journal of European Social Policy, December 1, 2009; 19(5): 395 - 407.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Acta SociologicaHome page
M. Pfeifer
Public Opinion on State Responsibility for Minimum Income Protection: A Comparison of 14 European Countries
Acta Sociologica, June 1, 2009; 52(2): 117 - 134.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Sociol RevHome page
M. M. Jaeger
United But Divided: Welfare Regimes and the Level and Variance in Public Support for Redistribution
Eur. Sociol. Rev., January 12, 2009; (2009) jcn079v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]