This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0010414007305813v1 41/11/1439    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Stoll, H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Social Cleavages and the Number of Parties

How the Measures You Choose Affect the Answers You Get

University of California, Santa Barbara

This article explores the issues surrounding the operationalization and measurement of social cleavages in a large-N context from the perspective of the party systems literature. It first highlights the difficulty of measuring the concept, which it argues has impeded hypothesis testing, and suggests strategies for improving upon existing measures. It then demonstrates that the conclusions we draw about well-known hypotheses linking social cleavages to the number of electoral parties in legislative elections depend upon the measure we employ. Hence, the article makes the case that how we measure social cleavages matters.

Key Words: social cleavages • social heterogeneity • electoral systems • party systems • measurement

This version was published on November 1, 2008

Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 41, No. 11, 1439-1465 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0010414007305813


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?