Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Comparative Political Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rakner, L.
Right arrow Articles by Khembo, N. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Fissions and Fusions, Foes and Friends

Party System Restructuring in Malawi in the 2004 General Elections

Lise Rakner

Christian Michelsen Institute and University of Bergen, Norway

Lars Svåsand

University of Bergen, Norway, lars.svasand{at}isp.uib.no

Nixon S. Khembo, PhD

University of Malawi, Zomba

The issue of presidential term limits is an important political norm on the African continent, but the effects of this on the institutionalization of the party systems have so far not been analyzed. The authors argue that the third presidential election represents a window of opportunity for politicians aspiring for the top position, leading to party fragmentation (fissions) and party mergers (fusions). Politicians pursue an office-seeking strategy, weakly connected to ideological priorities. The combination of leadership-centered parties, executive dominance, and the institutional rules for presidential elections encourage turbulence in the party system in the context of the third elections. The authors illustrate these processes with the case of Malawi's 2004 presidential and parliamentary elections, which led to a number of new party formations. After the elections, fusions of parties and coalitions among parties became alternative strategies for winning office.

Key Words: Malawi • political parties • party system • elections

Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 40, No. 9, 1112-1137 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0010414006290782


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?