Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Comparative Political Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, O. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Varieties of Capitalism and Hybrid Success

Denmark in the Global Economy

John L. Campbell

Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire and Copenhagen Business School, Denmark

Ove K. Pedersen

Copenhagen Business School, Denmark

The varieties of capitalism literature maintains that advanced capitalist countries whose institutions best fit either the liberal or coordinated market economy types will perform better than countries whose institutions are mixed. This is because hybrids are less likely to yield functionally beneficial institutional complementarities. The authors challenge this assertion. Denmark has performed as well as many purer cases during the 1990s. And Denmark has recently developed a more hybrid form than is generally recognized by (a) increasing the exposure of actors to market forces and (b) decentralizing collective learning and decision making. The institutional complementarities associated with such hybridization have contributed to its success; however, these complementarities are based on institutional heterogeneity rather than homogeneity. This is demonstrated by analyses of three cases: Danish labor markets, vocational training, and industrial policy. The implication of the authors’ argument is that the varieties of capitalism theory is logically flawed.

Key Words: varieties of capitalism • institutional complementarity • Denmark

Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 40, No. 3, 307-332 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0010414006286542


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ECON GEOGRHome page
A. D. Dixon and A. H. B. Monk
The power of finance: accounting harmonization's effect on pension provision
J. Econ. Geogr., September 1, 2009; 9(5): 619 - 639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Socioecon RevHome page
C. Crouch, W. Streeck, R. Whitley, and J. L. Campbell
Institutional change and globalization
Socioecon. Rev., July 1, 2007; 5(3): 527 - 567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]