Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!
Comparative Political Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, A.
Right arrow Articles by Elman, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Case Study Methods in the International Relations Subfield

Andrew Bennett

Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.

Colin Elman

Arizona State University, Tempe

This article reviews the key role that case study methods have played in the study of international relations (IR) in the United States. Case studies in the IR subfield are not the unconnected, atheoretical, and idiographic studies that their critics decry. IR case studies follow an increasingly standardized and rigorous set of prescriptions and have, together with statistical and formal work, contributed to cumulatively improving understandings of world politics. The article discusses and reviews examples of case selection criteria (including least likely, least and most similar, and deviant cases); conceptual innovation; typo-logical theories, explanatory typologies, qualitative comparative analysis, and fuzzy-set analysis; process tracing; and the integration of multiple methods.

Key Words: qualitative methods • case selection • conceptual innovation • explanatory typologies • multimethod analysis • process tracing

Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 40, No. 2, 170-195 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0010414006296346
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Comparative Political StudiesHome page
J. Mahoney, E. Kimball, and K. L. Koivu
The Logic of Historical Explanation in the Social Sciences
Comparative Political Studies, January 1, 2009; 42(1): 114 - 146.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Comparative Political StudiesHome page
J. Mahoney
Qualitative Methodology and Comparative Politics
Comparative Political Studies, February 1, 2007; 40(2): 122 - 144.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Comparative Political StudiesHome page
J. S. Levy
Qualitative Methods and Cross-Method Dialogue in Political Science
Comparative Political Studies, February 1, 2007; 40(2): 196 - 214.
[Abstract] [PDF]