Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Comparative Political Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alter, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Private Litigants and the New International Courts

Karen J. Alter

Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, kalter{at}northwestern.edu

Scholars expect International Courts (ICs) with private access and compulsory jurisdiction to be more independent and effective. This article shows a trend of creating and using ICs with compulsory jurisdiction and private access, using as evidence the founding statutes and usage rates of 20 ICs created since 1945. Analyzing where and for what private actors are granted access to ICs, the author finds that what is driving the expansion of private access and compulsory jurisdiction is an attempt to extend the types of juridical checks found at the domestic level to the international governance level. Although this trend will likely lead to more rights claiming by private actors, limitations on the types of cases that can be raised combined with a lack of usage suggests that outside of Europe, private right claiming potentials have yet to be exploited.

Key Words: international organizations • international law • courts • delegation • Europe

Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 39, No. 1, 22-49 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0010414005283216


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Comparative Political StudiesHome page
R. A. Cichowski
Introduction: Courts, Democracy, and Governance
Comparative Political Studies, February 1, 2006; 39(1): 3 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Comparative Political StudiesHome page
R. A. Cichowski
Courts, Rights, and Democratic Participation
Comparative Political Studies, February 1, 2006; 39(1): 50 - 75.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Comparative Political StudiesHome page
L. Conant
Individuals, Courts, and the Development of European Social Rights
Comparative Political Studies, February 1, 2006; 39(1): 76 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Comparative Political StudiesHome page
T. A. Borzel
Participation Through Law Enforcement: The Case of the European Union
Comparative Political Studies, February 1, 2006; 39(1): 128 - 152.
[Abstract] [PDF]