Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more about Comparative Politics

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Comparative Political Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O’Reilly, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Veto Points, Veto Players, and International Trade Policy

Robert F. O’Reilly

Emory University

Much of the literature on foreign economic policy focuses on the preferences of societal groups to explain policy decisions. Here, however, the author emphasizes the effects of domestic political institutions that intervene between policy demands and policy decisions. The comparative politics literature on social welfare policy argues that states with more veto points and/or veto players are less able to alter preexisting policies. The author applies this argument to trade policy and tests whether veto points and players affect the ability of states to change tariffs and nontariff barriers in response to changing economic conditions. The sample is a cross-national time-series collection of 23 countries. The results offer support for the argument. Large numbers of institutional veto points are associated with smaller percentage changes in both tariffs and nontariff barriers. These relationships hold even after controlling for the effects of international institutions and for domestic pressures to change tariff and nontariff-barrier levels.

Key Words: veto points • veto players • trade policy • international political economy • tariffs • nontariff barriers

Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 38, No. 6, 652-675 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0010414004274379


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?