Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Comparative Political Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kastner, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rector, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Partisanship and the Path to Financial Openness

Scott L. Kastner

University of Maryland

Chad Rector

George Washington University

The effect of traditional left-right economic preferences on countries’ international financial openness is more subtle than existing studies have recognized. The authors investigate the role that partisan politics played in the liberalization of international financial markets within 12 Western European democracies from 1960 to 1986. The authors find that right governments tended to be active liberalizers of the capital account. They were more likely than left governments to enact liberalizations, and liberalizations were especially likely when new right governments entered office. Left governments typically acquiesced to these changes. Although less likely to enact liberalizations, they were no more likely to impose new restrictions. The authors’ findings are consistent with studies that show how financial integration does not undermine welfare states but is still subject to partisan contention.

Key Words: partisanship • capital controls • financial liberalization • Western Europe • welfare state

Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 38, No. 5, 484-506 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0010414004272540


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
INT RELAT ASIA PACHome page
S. Omori
Exploring political determinants of the magnitude of financial reforms in developing countries
International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, May 1, 2007; 7(2): 251 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]