Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Comparative Political Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saiegh, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Do Countries Have a "Democratic Advantage"?

Political Institutions, Multilateral Agencies, and Sovereign Borrowing

Sebastian M. Saiegh

University of Pittsburgh

This article examines the effect of political institutions on countries’ risk characteristics and the role that domestic political institutions play in determining the interest rates charged to less developed countries. According to the "democratic advantage" argument, democracies should pay lower interest rates than authoritarian regimes because they are better able to make credible commitments. The author argues that such a claim must be revised in the case of developing countries. The results presented in this article support this assertion. First, they show that democracies are more likely to reschedule their debts, so they have no advantage; rather, the opposite is true. Second, there does not appear to be a significant difference between the interest rates paid by democracies and nondemocracies.

Key Words: sovereign borrowing • democratic advantage • multilateral lending • developing countries • nonrandom selection

Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 38, No. 4, 366-387 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0010414004273204


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
A. C. Garriga
Regime Type and Bilateral Treaty Formalization: Do Too Many Cooks Spoil the Soup?
Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2009; 53(5): 698 - 726.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
J. H. Lebovic and E. Voeten
The Cost of Shame: International Organizations and Foreign Aid in the Punishing of Human Rights Violators
Journal of Peace Research, January 1, 2009; 46(1): 79 - 97.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Comparative Political StudiesHome page
G. Biglaiser, B. Hicks, and C. Huggins
Sovereign Bond Ratings and the Democratic Advantage: Portfolio Investment in the Developing World
Comparative Political Studies, August 1, 2008; 41(8): 1092 - 1116.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science polHome page
J. Rodriguez and J. Santiso
Banking on Democracy: The Political Economy of International Private Bank Lending in Emerging Markets
International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, March 1, 2008; 29(2): 215 - 246.
[Abstract] [PDF]