| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Do Countries Have a "Democratic Advantage"?Political Institutions, Multilateral Agencies, and Sovereign BorrowingUniversity of Pittsburgh This article examines the effect of political institutions on countries risk characteristics and the role that domestic political institutions play in determining the interest rates charged to less developed countries. According to the "democratic advantage" argument, democracies should pay lower interest rates than authoritarian regimes because they are better able to make credible commitments. The author argues that such a claim must be revised in the case of developing countries. The results presented in this article support this assertion. First, they show that democracies are more likely to reschedule their debts, so they have no advantage; rather, the opposite is true. Second, there does not appear to be a significant difference between the interest rates paid by democracies and nondemocracies.
Key Words: sovereign borrowing democratic advantage multilateral lending developing countries nonrandom selection
Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 38, No. 4,
366-387 (2005) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



