Comparative Political Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kumlin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Rothstein, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 38, No. 4, 339-365 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0010414004273203
© 2005 SAGE Publications

Making and Breaking Social Capital

The Impact of Welfare-State Institutions

Staffan Kumlin

Göteborg University

Bo Rothstein

Göteborg University

Since the debate about the importance of social capital and civil society for the quality of democracy began, Scandinavia has caused problems. Observers have been bewildered by an allegedly paradoxical coexistence of a wealth of social capital and extensive welfare-state arrangements. Some theorize that large welfare states make engagement in voluntary associations unnecessary, making the production of social capital more difficult. However, empirical research shows Scandinavia to have comparatively high levels of social capital. To solve this paradox, the authors address how the causal mechanism between variation in the design of welfare-state institutions and social capital works. The empirical analysis, based on Swedish survey data, suggests that the specific design of welfare-state policies matters for the production of social capital. Contacts with universal welfare-state institutions tend to increase social trust, whereas experiences with needs-testing social programs undermine it. The policy implication is that governments, by designing welfare-state institutions, can invest in social capital.

Key Words: social capital • trust • welfare-state institutions • Sweden • policy feedback


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur Sociol RevHome page
C. Bjornskov
Social Trust and Fractionalization: A Possible Reinterpretation
Eur. Sociol. Rev., July 1, 2008; 24(3): 271 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
D. Wollebaek and K. Stromsnes
Voluntary Associations, Trust, and Civic Engagement: A Multilevel Approach
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, June 1, 2008; 37(2): 249 - 263.
[Abstract] [PDF]