Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Comparative Political Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Samuels, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

From Socialism to Social Democracy

Party Organization and the Transformation of the Workers’ Party in Brazil

David Samuels

University of Minnesota

Luis Inácio Lula da Silva’s victory in Brazil’s 2002 presidential election brought to power Latin America’s largest leftist party, the Workers’Party (Partido dos Trabalhadores [PT]). The PTwon because it moved to the center, and voters regarded this shift as credible. The party’s transformation is puzzling, because political scientists do not expect strategic flexibility in "mass bureaucratic" parties, which the PT resembles. Although exogenous factors are important, the key to understanding the party’s strategic adaptation lies with its internal institutions, which generate substantial leadership accountability. The weight of pragmatists in the rank and file grew in the 1990s following the party’s success in subnational executive elections and its consequent need to demonstrate results in office. These rank-and-file members could influence the party’s direction because of the party’s internally democratic institutions. The PT’s transformation reveals that strategic flexibility can emerge in mass parties even when the leadership lacks autonomy.

Key Words: Workers’Party • Brazil • Lula • political parties

Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 37, No. 9, 999-1024 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0010414004268856


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Law Econ OrganHome page
G.-H. Jeong, G. J. Miller, and A. C. Sobel
Political Compromise and Bureaucratic Structure: The Political Origins of the Federal Reserve System
J. Law Econ. Organ., October 1, 2009; 25(2): 472 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
POLIT ANALHome page
T. J. Mustillo
Modeling New Party Performance: A Conceptual and Methodological Approach for Volatile Party Systems
Political Analysis, July 1, 2009; 17(3): 311 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science polHome page
J. W. Cason and T. J. Power
Presidentialization, Pluralization, and the Rollback of Itamaraty: Explaining Change in Brazilian Foreign Policy Making in the Cardoso-Lula Era
International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, March 1, 2009; 30(2): 117 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]