This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Eaton, K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Designing Subnational Institutions

Regional and Municipal Reforms in Postauthoritarian Chile

Princeton University

This article conceptualizes decentralization as a change in the institutional rules that divide political authority and governing capacity between levels of government. By emphasizing the institutional dimension, the author argues that different approaches to the study of institutions, namely, rational and historical institutionalism, can generate analytical leverage on the contemporary trend of decentralization. In the Chilean case, rationalist perspectives illuminate the country’s continued status as one of Latin America’s most centralized polities. Comparatively weak subnational institutions directly reflect the strategic design considerations of national politicians. However, concepts central to historical institutionalism, including critical junctures and unanticipated consequences, explain how and why decentralization gained steam in the postauthoritarian period. Specifically, Chile’s shift to more decentralized institutions is the legacy of Pinochet-era reforms of subnational government, sequencing patterns that devolved governing capacity before political authority, and the emergence of new organizational actors who have struggled to decentralize Chile against the opposition of powerful national politicians.

Key Words: decentralization • democratization • Latin America • Chile • Pinochet

Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 37, No. 2, 218-244 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0010414003260979


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Andersson and F. van Laerhoven From Local Strongman to Facilitator: Institutional Incentives for Participatory Municipal Governance in Latin America Comparative Political Studies, September 1, 2007; 40(9): 1085 - 1111. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. M. Z. The Congressional Politics of Decentralization: The Case of Chile Comparative Political Studies, March 1, 2007; 40(3): 333 - 358. [Abstract] [PDF]