Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Comparative Political Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonoli, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Social Policy through Labor Markets

Understanding National Differences in the Provision of Economic Security to Wage Earners

Giuliano Bonoli

University of Bern

Recent work in comparative political economy has emphasized the existence of functional equivalents to the welfare state in the area of labor market policy. In many European countries, in Australia, and in New Zealand, labor laws, minimum wages, and collective agreements have traditionally played an important role in guaranteeing a certain level of economic security for workers and their families. This article tries to explain why different countries have developed different instruments for providing economic security to wage earners. It compares labor legislation and practices across several European countries and focuses on the detailed trajectory of France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. It finds that state-society relationships and ideological influences at key historical moments can help understand the original divergence, which is perpetuated through a typical path-dependent development.

Key Words: labor market policy • employment protection • social policy • welfare state • path dependency

Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 36, No. 9, 1007-1030 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0010414003257099


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Socioecon RevHome page
P. Emmenegger
Specificity versus replaceability: the relationship between skills and preferences for job security regulations
Socioecon. Rev., July 1, 2009; 7(3): 407 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Socioecon RevHome page
E. Viebrock and J. Clasen
Flexicurity and welfare reform: a review
Socioecon. Rev., April 1, 2009; 7(2): 305 - 331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JIRHome page
P. Smyth
Closing the Gap? The Role of Wage, Welfare and Industry Policy in Promoting Social Inclusion
Journal of Industrial Relations, September 1, 2008; 50(4): 647 - 663.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Global Social PolicyHome page
S. Mcbride and K. Mcnutt
Devolution and Neoliberalism in the Canadian Welfare State: Ideology, National and International Conditioning Frameworks, and Policy Change in British Columbia
Global Social Policy, August 1, 2007; 7(2): 177 - 201.
[Abstract] [PDF]