Comparative Political Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jupille, J.
Right arrow Articles by Checkel, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 36, No. 1-2, 7-40 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0010414002239370

Integrating Institutions

Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union

Joseph Jupille

Florida International University

James A. Caporaso

University of Washington

Jeffrey T. Checkel

University of Oslo

Three central goals motivate this introductory essay and the articles that follow. First, we seek better understanding of the EU's own institutions, especially to the extent that they play a role in or represent the process of integration. Second, we seek better integration of the multiple general understandings of institutions and primarily of rationalist and constructivist conceptions. Third and most important, we seek to promote the integration of institutional research. Our overarching argument is that metatheoretical debate about institutions has run its course and must now give way to theoretical, methodological, and carefully structured empirical dialogue. To this end, we offer specific strategies for promoting greater synthesis among competing institutional schools.

Key Words: institutional theory • rationalism • constructivism • European Union • research design • methodology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
European Union PoliticsHome page
T. Konig, B. Luetgert, and T. Dannwolf
Quantifying European Legislative Research: Using CELEX and PreLex in EU Legislative Studies
European Union Politics, December 1, 2006; 7(4): 553 - 574.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Comparative Political StudiesHome page
E. Montpetit, C. Rothmayr, and F. Varone
Institutional Vulnerability to Social Constructions: Federalism, Target Populations, and Policy Designs for Assisted Reproductive Technology in Six Democracies
Comparative Political Studies, March 1, 2005; 38(2): 119 - 142.
[Abstract] [PDF]