This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hug, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Endogenous Preferences And Delegation In The European Union

Universität St. Gallen

The interplay among intergovernmental and supranational actors is a defining feature of the institutional life of the European Union (EU). Too often, however, these actors are considered independent of each other, and their autonomy is assessed in a vacuum. This is problematic because if there is such a thing as "endogenous preferences" in the EU, it appears exactly through this interdependence of intergovernmental and supranational actors. None of the institutionalist approaches to the EU has come to grips with this fact yet. Based on some very simple gametheoretic ideas, I offer in this article a rationale for "endogenous preferences" and discuss their impact on issues of delegations. Some cursory empirical evidence supports the claims that the preferences of supranational actors are related to those of the actors who select or appoint them. Similarly, the analyses presented here suggest that preferences over delegation to supranational actors are influenced by differences in policy views between principals and agents.

Key Words: European Union • delegation • Commission • endogenous preferences • appointment • European Parliament

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Mastenbroek and T. Veen Last Words on Delegation?: Examining The Powers of the Union European Union Politics, June 1, 2008; 9(2): 295 - 311. [PDF]

				E. Tannam The European Commission's Evolving Role in Conflict Resolution: The Case of Northern Ireland 1989 2005 Cooperation and Conflict, September 1, 2007; 42(3): 337 - 356. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Doring The Composition of the College of Commissioners: Patterns of Delegation European Union Politics, June 1, 2007; 8(2): 207 - 228. [Abstract] [PDF]