This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Scharpf, F. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Institutions in Comparative Policy Research

Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies

The article explores the intersections between the different perspectives of institutional and policy research and discusses the characteristic purposes and conditions of theory-oriented policy research, where the usefulness of statistical analyses is generally constrained by the complexity and contingency of causal influences. Although comparative case studies are better able to deal with these conditions, their capacity to empirically identify the causal effect of differing institutional conditions on policy outcomes depends on a restrictive case selection that would need to hold constant the influence of two other sets of contingent factors—the policy challenges actually faced and the preferences and perceptions of the actors involved. When this is not possible, empirical policy research may usefully resort to a set of institutionalist working hypotheses that are derived from the narrowly specified theoretical assumptions of rational-choice institutionalism. Although these hypotheses will often be wrong, they are useful in guiding the empirical search for factors that are able to explain policy outcomes that deviate from predictions of the rationalist model.

Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 33, No. 6-7, 762-790 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/001041400003300604


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Kumpers, I. Mur, H. Maarse, and A. van Raak A Comparative Study of Dementia Care in England and the Netherlands Using Neo-Institutionalist Perspectives Qual Health Res, November 1, 2005; 15(9): 1199 - 1230. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Montpetit, C. Rothmayr, and F. Varone Institutional Vulnerability to Social Constructions: Federalism, Target Populations, and Policy Designs for Assisted Reproductive Technology in Six Democracies Comparative Political Studies, March 1, 2005; 38(2): 119 - 142. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Oliver and E. Mossialos European health systems reforms: looking backward to see forward? Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, February 1, 2005; 30(1-2): 7 - 28. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Rico and J. Costa-Font Power Rather Than Path Dependency? The Dynamics of Institutional Change under Health Care Federalism Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, February 1, 2005; 30(1-2): 231 - 252. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. Bunce Comparative Democratization: Big and Bounded Generalizations Comparative Political Studies, September 1, 2000; 33(6-7): 703 - 734. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Levi The Economic Turn in Comparative Politics Comparative Political Studies, September 1, 2000; 33(6-7): 822 - 844. [Abstract] [PDF]