Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Comparative Political Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ANSELL, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by FISH, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Art of Being Indispensable

Noncharismatic Personalism in Contemporary Political Parties

CHRISTOPHER K. ANSELL

University of California, Berkeley

M. STEVEN FISH

University of California, Berkeley

Max Weber's theory of leadership authority has deeply influenced theories of political parties, but Weber's concept of charisma is often used indiscriminately to refer to all kinds of personalist leadership. What is more, Weber's tripartite typology of traditional, charismatic and rational-legal authority neglects a form of leadership often found in major contemporary political parties. This article formulates a differentiated typology and conceptualization of personalism, and theorizes an important but heretofore poorly understood form of political organization: the non-charismatic personalist political party. The leaders of such parties embody great personal authority within their organizations and often serve as symbols around which their parties can rally. But they are anything but prophets. Their authority arises not from an ability to inspire or transform their followers but rather from the skill to mediate conflicts within the party.

Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 32, No. 3, 283-312 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0010414099032003001
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Party PoliticsHome page
L. March
Power and Opposition in the Former Soviet Union: The Communist Parties of Moldova and Russia
Party Politics, May 1, 2006; 12(3): 341 - 365.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Party PoliticsHome page
J. T. Ishiyama
Candidate Recruitment and the Development of Russian Political Parties, 1993-99
Party Politics, July 1, 2001; 7(4): 387 - 411.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Comparative Political StudiesHome page
H. Kitschelt
Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities
Comparative Political Studies, September 1, 2000; 33(6-7): 845 - 879.
[Abstract] [PDF]