Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more about Comparative Politics

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Comparative Political Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SCARRITT, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by McMILLAN, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Protest and Rebellion in Africa

Explaining Conflicts between Ethnic Minorities and the State in the 1980s

JAMES R. SCARRITT

University of Colorado, Boulder

SUSAN McMILLAN

Pennsylvania State University

This article examines the sub-Saharan African portion of the global Minorities at Risk project. It analyzes the relationships between group characteristics, grievances, mobilization, state characteristics, and nonviolent protest and rebellion in Africa and compares these relationships with those found in a global analysis using the same data set. Mobilization is more important than group characteristics or grievances in explaining nonviolent protest and rebellion in the 1980s globally, and especially in Africa because political action there is taken mainly in response to the dynamics of mobilization and state response over the last 30 years. The state characteristics that are associated with the two forms of political action in Africa and globally differ; in the former case the strongest relationships are between greater—although partial—democracy in the 1960s and nonviolent protest and between competitiveness of participation in the 1960s and rebellion. An interpretive explanation of these differences is presented.

Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 28, No. 3, 323-349 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0010414095028003001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
H. Hegre, G. Ostby, and C. Raleigh
Poverty and Civil War Events: A Disaggregated Study of Liberia
Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2009; 53(4): 598 - 623.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Comparative Political StudiesHome page
J. R. SCARRITT, S. M. McMILLAN, and S. MOZAFFAR
The Interaction Between Democracy and Ethnopolitical Protest and Rebellion in Africa
Comparative Political Studies, September 1, 2001; 34(7): 800 - 827.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
R. Blanton, T. D. Mason, and B. Athow
Colonial Style and Post-Colonial Ethnic Conflict in Africa
Journal of Peace Research, July 1, 2001; 38(4): 473 - 491.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Comparative Political StudiesHome page
M. R. CLEARY
Democracy and Indigenous Rebellion in Latin America
Comparative Political Studies, November 1, 2000; 33(9): 1123 - 1153.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
R. Dudley and R. A. Miller
Group Rebellion in the 1980s
Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 1998; 42(1): 77 - 96.
[Abstract]