This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0010414007308537v1 41/12/1607    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Tavits, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Representation, Corruption, and Subjective Well-Being

University of Missouri-Columbia

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tavitsm{at}missouri.edu.

	Abstract

This study examines the effect of corruption and representation on people’s subjective well-being. Using cross-national data from 68 countries and survey data from 16 European democracies, the analysis demonstrates that people report higher levels of subjective well-being when (a) their governments perform well (i.e., are clean rather than corrupt) and (b) the party of their choice is in power. The effect of corruption overshadows that of macroeconomic variables and conditions the effect of representation—having one’s party of choice in power increases well-being when governments are clean but not when they are corrupt. These findings provide strong and systematic evidence that governments can have a significant impact on people’s well-being.

First published on November 6, 2007, doi:10.1177/0010414007308537

Comparative Political Studies 2008;41:1607.

A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?